Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Probably most usuefully the opposing force (law of nature, law of state, etc.) 
nullified.



----- Original Message ----
From: maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, November 17, 2011 5:29:34 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like

2011/11/17 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lojban doesn't have a word for the dual of "ka'e", so we have to make
> do with "na ka'e na".
>

I'm surprised at that! I wasn't 100% sure that {ka'e}/{kakne} were the
correct words for modal possibility.  Is it fair to say that the
"conditions" {te kakne} are the worlds themselves in which {da kakne},
or is x3 more general?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.