Re: [lojban] About the word "fluent".

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:29:42PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > >>And it doesn't matter what the reasons for that are, the fact
> > >>stays the same.
> > >
> > >Then it is physically impossible to be fluent in Lojban at this
> > >time, because this will happen all the time every day until
> > >idiom is built up.
> > >
> > And here I disagree. I am asserting that with the current
> > Lojban, you *can* be fluent. Not having lujvo for some things
> > doesn't mean you can't talk about them by describing them in
> > "simpler" terms.
> 
> Which is exactly what I did, so what's your point?

Well, to be fair, I had to look up {minra}, which is fucking lame.
:)  But I hadn't told you that, so it doesn't count.

You seem to be asserting that anyone who ever pauses to think about
something isn't fluent, which, umm, no.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.