On 14 March 2012 19:42, Escape Landsome
<escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
coi rodo,
I am currently playing with the idea of tanru and fu'ivla.
Would you say a "Philips screwdriver" is kucylupcartci ?
Another question : a tanru mixes two notions X and Y in a (X & Y)
(which is, indeed, primarily a Y which has X-ness)
But suppose I want to speak of a (X & Y & Z)... ? *not* of a (X & (Y
& Z)), nor of a ((X & Y) & Z), but of a (X & Y & Z), without assigning
any precedence in the way the notions are mingling together ?
Put in another words, suppose I want to talk about a pretty little
girls' school while remaining deliberately ambiguous ?
[this can be useful even without any malign intention : there are a
lot of old books with ambiguous X's Y's Z constructs, and if we want
to translate them into Lojban we need to keep the ambiguity as it is]
-- .esk.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.