Re: [lojban] Directional facing (xorxes, please read).

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:22:37PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:
> Am 01.06.2012 14:00, schrieb Jorge Llambías:
> >On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Robin Lee Powell
> ><rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>  wrote:
> >>On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:03:22PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> >>>I take "farna" to be about orientation, not about location.
> >>On what basis?
> >It's what makes the most sense.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >>>There is "ragve" for the relative locations of three objects in
> >>>line.
> >>That's a reason to *wish* farna was about orientation, but I see no
> >>evidence that it actually *is* about orientation.
> >I can give you lots of usage as evidence, but maybe it would be mostly from me.
> >
> >I also take "fa'a" to be about orientation and not about location, BTW.
> 
> Exactly. fa'a indicates the orientation of the main event. And since
> fa'a is fi'o farna, farna also must be about orientation. I use fa'a
> exclusively for orientation.

*whimper*

Sorry, I agree about fa'a; I'm just so tired of seeing
contradictory / ambigiuous stuff around here that needs resolving.

-Robin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.