Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Or course, one can say that a chair is something to sit on, but when
> the language is specified in such a way that a chair is encoded as a
> "to-sit-on-thing" in its morphology itself, a big part of the
> definition process is automatized and thus, "silly".

What? How is "to-sit-on-thing" encoded in the morphology of "stuzi"
any more than in the morphology of "chair"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.