Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.

[vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>]

On 06/21/2012 04:30 AM, osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote:
> n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote:
>>
>> Google alerts recently informed me of this: 
> 
> 
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary
>>
>> Do we care?
>>
>> -- 
>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>
>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>>
> 
> I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from obscurity. We need 
> all the visibility we can muster. 
> 

Please note that this proposal is to delete the dictionary of lojban in
lojban (e.g. https://jbo.wiktionary.org/wiki/cusku), which is distinct
from the dictionary of lojban in English (e.g.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cusku). In my opinion only the latter
(and its other-natlang siblings) are useful for mustering visibility.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.