Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.

[kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk>]

On 24 Jun 2012, at 00:04, kozmikreis wrote:

On 23 Jun 2012, at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote:

As I've already said:

If you think the Lojban Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to say so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the people that have a say in the matter.

The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the project, some are stated as if there are some criteria, most likely derived from http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Closing_projects_policy , that could be met to keep it.  I doubt random people adding "ohai, i luvs ur pages, plz keepz xxx" would suffice ;-)

As I've already said:

I don't understand what criteria needs to be met.

kozmikreis

Looks like it's not that bad if it's closed, closing does not mean deleting - from http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Closing_projects_policy#Definition_of_actions : "Closing a wiki means locking its database so that it cannot be edited by anyone except stewards, but all pages are still visible to public."

kozmikreis

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.