Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk> wrote:

On 23 Jun 2012, at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote:

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk> wrote:

On 21 Jun 2012, at 10:30, osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote:

n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote:

Google alerts recently informed me of this: 

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary

Do we care?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from obscurity. We need all the visibility we can muster. 

I wholeheartedly agree.  It's a good enough resource for beginners and it brings visibility and credence.  Is there any harm in keeping it, and if not how do we go about making an actionable objection to its loss beyond what's otherwise merely an academic discussion on a mailing list?  I don't understand what criteria needs to be met.

Thanks,

kozmikreis

As I've already said:

If you think the Lojban Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to say so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the people that have a say in the matter.

The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the project

No, the page I've linked to is /the proposal/, with votes for or against and the reasons for those votes listed below.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.