On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
That is to say, this noise volume is much less in the case of a whole
confusible paradigme (as so'V is) than in any natlang case you would
give, or artifically create, for a paradigm is something that shares
both naturalness and commonness.
You keep saying that, yet still you provide nothing to support your claim. No evidence of any kind. It's beginning to sound like a mindless chant.
As those in the scientific community are quite fond of saying, PROVE IT.
-- mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.