On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:02 PM, And Rosta
<and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:
la gleki, On 09/07/2012 06:08:
On Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:44:50 PM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
Curious...
Why not just make it already?
Quit talking and just do it. >_>
Indeed. And Rosta, please present something.
Alas, Gleki, it is on my list of projects, but with relatively low priority on that list. Specifically, there are two relevant projects: one is an essay describing a possible solution to the core problem of loglangs (namely, representation of co-filled argument places); the other is an essay describing a modular approach to the creation of a logical language. The second is not stunningly original, but might serve to frame and focus any collaborative effort that ever emerges. As for the first, I'm not convinced the solution is processable by the human language faculty, and the problem may instead remain unsolved; I suppose publishing it might spur others to seek better solutions, but shortage of time for publishing one's projects is the bane of my life.
I could sit down and jot down in an email a sketch of something patently better as a loglang than Lojban, but the only worthwhile loglang is the one that cracks that fundamental problem of ergonomically representing co-filled argument places; without that, any other incremental improvement to Lojban has lost its appeal to me.
--And.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.