>>> How about: x1 is the internal subjective identity of x2 according to
>>> x3
>>>
>>> Thus {tu'a lo nanmu mi ceinse} would be "I'm male-gendered" (I'm
>>> putting a tu'a in there because otherwise I feel like I'm saying
>>> something more like {da poi nanmu zo'u da mi ceinse}, which doesn't
>>> make sense.) and {tu'a lo tinbe mi ceinse} could be used for "I'm a
>>> submissive" or {tu'a lo arxokuna mi mi ceinse} for "I self-identify
>>> as a raccoon." (e.g. a furry).
>>
>> That's actually too *narrow* -- it doesn't allow us to talk about how we
>> gender inanimate objects and each other. (E.g., <
http://is.gd/HXdBMy>,
>> <
http://is.gd/aFzoSg>.)
>>
>
> The use of "gender" in that context is different than self-identification;
> it's targeting based on gender, and that's a tanru/lujvo.