[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: a LoCCan3 discussion platform?
On Friday, July 13, 2012 1:54:09 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote:Apparently some people have been giving much thought to the
potentiality of a next-generation logical language, which include
myself even though I haven't taken part in the recent LoCCan3
conversation. The concept has at least intellectual merits and may
deserve detailed examination & organization. That's perhaps beyond the
scope of this mailing list, and the process might benefit from inputs
from different existing conlang (& natlang) communities.
Is there a dedicated platform for such a process? Would you be
interested in having one?
I'm not interested. It will definitely split Loccan-land once again.
Look what happened to Logland. They had magazines. But we don't discuss them cuz we mostly can't even read them.
It's more than easy to convert loglandic texts to lojban, import them into lojban.org wiki.
Are we too lazy?
We are the biggest logical and language semantic community in the world. Others either have useless theories that can't be turned into real language
or just don't have any disussions of logic and semantic (like Esperantujo).
We set rules, not Ithkuilists or anybody else. Just because we simply outnumber them.
If some conlanger, especially loglanger is not familiar with Lojban, it's eir problem.
.e'u casnu lo se zbasu bangu bau lo jbobau po'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/rI6jyI2orFIJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.