[lojban] Re: the day after tomorrow and the day before yesterday

[la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

On May 29, 7:43 am, Jacob Errington <nicty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, there is. The gismu deep structure is wrong:
> lo ka bavbavlamdei cu ka ce'u djedi gi'e lamji ce'u noi balvi *lo balvi be
> ce'u*
> where the added on "lo balvi" is the result of tacking on the extra -bav-.
> So "a day that is adjacent to an event that is in the future of the future
> of an event" i.e. BAD.
>
> In fact, the GDS for bavlamdei is really messy:
> lo ka bavlamdei cu ka ce'u djedi gi'e lamji ce'u noi balvi ce'u
>
> You might as well just use {ba za re lo djedi}
>
> My ramblings:
> {lo se detri be li za'u} is an interesting solution, where the number of
> "tomorrows" can be indicated after the za'u:
> {lo se detri be li za'ure} -> "the day after tomorrow" and {lo se detri be
> li za'uci} "the day after that".
> If {za'u} had a lujvo, which is sadly does not, I'd propose: {za'u zei
> seldetri} = x1 is the event occurring on date x2 days after x3 at location
> x4 by caldendar x5.
> Unfortunately {za'u zei seldetri} suffers from karcykla syndrome: is it
> days, months, weeks, years? *shrug* we can't know
Shouldn't we add {pi'e} to point to week/month/year?
> Even with {lo se detri
> be li za'u} we can't really know to what the za'u is adding.
>
> On 28 May 2012 22:50, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is there something wrong with {bavbavlamdei} and {pruprulamdei}?
>
> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jacob Errington <nicty...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Well, considering {bavlamdei = d1=b1=l1 is tomorrow; d1=b1=l1 is the day
> > > following b2=l2, day standard d3,}
> > > {lo bavlamdei be lo bavlamdei (be lo cabdei)} does it, but that's long.
> > > You could say {lo bavlamdei bavlamdei} but that's almost as long.
> > > I personally have used the PA rafsi to pull this off: {lo relbavlamdei}
> > or
> > > {lo bavrelylamdei}; however, I don't know if this is acceptable.
>
> > > On 26 May 2012 15:54, Andrew Dibble <acdib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Is there a simple Lojban word for these phrases?
>
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > >> "lojban" group.
> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> > >>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/039gbB7uvNAJ.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "lojban" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
> > --
> >           Alex R
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "lojban" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.