Re: [lojban] May Lojban be considered as an ideal language philosophy?

[Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>]

If Lojban language is the ideal philosophical language, this is so in
the sense of the former Wittgenstein, who is logicist.

The later Wittgenstein is rather anti-logicist, so by the same kind of
argument, Lojban is the opposite of the ideal philosophical language.

It can be hold, for philosophical or even scientific reasons, that
metaphors are useful in thought expression : see Langacker, Lakoff,
and all hermeneuts.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.