{vlale'u} doesn't seem useful, but both {vlakemlerpoi} and {lerpoi} do.
My proposed definitions of lerpoi and vlakemlerpoi:
#1a .i lo ka lerpoi cu ka ce'u noi fa'ugi lu'a ke'a gi lu'o ke'a lerfu
ce'u fa'u zi'o zi'o fa'u ce'u cu porsi zi'o zi'o
"x1 is a character string (sequence of letters) in character set x2
representing x3."
porsi2 and porsi3 seem irrelevant. The fa'u-hackage is required,
because individually the letters-digits-symbols are a part of the
character set, but as a sequence or mass, aren't. However,
individually, they don't represent anything, but as a mass, they do.
The definition can be given with a termset rather than the non-logical
connective {fa'u}:
#1b .i lo ka lerpoi cu ka ce'u noi nu'i ge lu'a ke'a ce'u zi'o nu'u gi
lu'o ke'a zi'o ce'u lerfu cu porsi zi'o zi'o
(for simplicity's sake, I'm not going to give the full gismu-deep
structure of vlakemlerpoi)
#2 .i lo ka vlakemlerpoi cu ka ce'u lerpoi ce'u ce'u noi ke'a valsi ce'u ce'u
"x1 is a string in character set x3 representing word x3 meaning x4 in
language x5."
or "x1 is the spelling of x3."
mu'o mi'e la tsani
jbovlaste's definition for lerpoi doesn't seem to have a place for the
word formed by the sequence of letters. I have to repeat iesk's question.
On 07/20/2012 01:24 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> The consensus is on lerpoi.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:14 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>wrote:
>> I can't find it on vlasisku. I'd like to nominate {lerfu mifra} for
>> veljvo. (cf. lertermifra, character encoding.)
>>
>> On 07/20/2012 01:04 PM, iesk wrote:
>>> I'm sorry if I missed it, but ... *how do* I say '"broda" is spelt bee,
>>> ar, o, dee, a." in Lojban?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.