[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:31:41 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FDNTBJ7sPw5jH0NUFySQf/TVi/CBAOYAMaaGlrYRbbA=; b=b3rnO26YOHs5TOcpKxExPcMhrgKrci5Avil7khzyfPCaMgAzOx3EWFKyHFAyuLgBkz J693OtowEgxdKRSNBI0mR+5/tm5r6HEmUP54/OYU0OMU0tYVa7WOkr1o9fQsyPoEmaJh vuS8WSN797UMCNGSPrzwGrUSOGonTElOLyUBU=
In-reply-to: <1343578731.76088.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <1f5a4015-2150-46d6-804e-6f6c43c9acfa@googlegroups.com> <1343578731.76088.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

From a linguist's viewpoint, in today Linguistics, chomskyan grammars
are has-been.

They are supeseded by unification grammars.

And maybe, in some more years, cognitive grammars will render
unification grammars obsolete.

You still live in the 70's ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>

References:
- [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] again about "out of"
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] What's the current situation with Chomsky's grammar for Lojban?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread