We just need two words (after all, we have pairs: south-north, left-right).
x1 is rotating clockwise on axis x2 in reference frame x3.
x1 is rotating counterclockwise on axis x2 in reference frame x3.
Those are important enough to have something at gismu/fu'ivla-IV/zi'evla level.
The cultural bias is gone.
On Friday, August 10, 2012 8:00:09 PM UTC+4, Escape Landsome wrote:
You don't prove any of what you claim.
But, whatever... If you claim you can define "clockwise" without
mentioning a clock, or the apparent move of the Sun in the North
hemisphery, please do it.
And tell us how you do it.
I'm really curious as how you define "clockwise" without any cultural
reference... Really...