Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation

[MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:18 AM, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:

Maybe something like {prityfalgu'o} and {zulfalgu'o}?

That's fairly inaccurate. Rotation has nothing to with gravity, and falling /requires/ it. It is perfectly possible for something to move/rotate in a clockwise direction without falling. Every celestial body that isn't rotating counter-clockwise does it. (technically: the rotation of the Earth has nothing to do with the fact that the Earth is perpetually falling toward Sol.)

What is the standard for determining north/right-left? 

Whether Earth (and other bodies in space) rotate and revolve clockwise or counterclockwise is purely arbitrary, 50/50. But once any one thing is determined to be north, everything else follows. 

How about using chirality as the basis of a definition? 

stevo 

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.

To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.