[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] The global problem of mirror paired predicates



Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
There are several pairs of predicates that can be expressed in a
different way.
1. left - right
2. south - north
3. east - west
4. female - male
5. white - black
6. expensive - cheap
7. healthy - ill
8. good - bad

Some conlangs like Esperanto have only one root for each pair and use
prefixes (e.g. "anti-") to express the second member of the set.
So
left = anti-right
ill =  anti-healthy

or
patro - father
patrino - mother (suffix -in- for females)

Ithkuil employs a different approach. It uses two affixes, something
like "plus" and "minus" to determine where on the scale we are present.
so e.g. we have a root for "good/bad" (let it be ROOT1) and for
  "left-right" (let it be ROOT2) and mark them with prefixes.

good = plus-ROOT1
bad = minus-ROOT2
right = plus-ROOT1
left = minus-ROOT2

If such policy applied in Lojbanistan left-handed people would
definitely leave the community as "minus" prefix is associated both with
"bad" and "left hand".
Somehow we must choose what is positive and what is negative.
Therefore I state that
*AFFIX POLICY FOR SCALE PREDICATE IN ESPERANTO AND ITHKUIL IS NOT
CULTURALLY NEUTRAL.*
The only way to be culturally neutral is the policy of many natural
languages, i.e. having two separate words for each member of the pair.
In Lojban we have {zunle - pritu}, {bemro - snanu} etc.
Note that even in Esperanto separate root appeared for cheap instead of
just "anti-expensive" which proves that such policy is naturalistic.

(This message appeared after discussing "clockwise" and
"counterclockwise" concepts in a separate topic that in my opinion also
deserve separate words).

Other solutions are culturally non-neutral.
Almost every person belongs  to some social minority: left-handed
minority, sexual minorities, ethnic minorities. But together they
constitute MAJORITY of the population.

In other words only the current policy of Lojban is best.
Yes, two separate words instead of one+affix is the cost of such neutrality.
(If you wanna be non-neutral please use {tolpritu} instead of {zunle},
it's absolutely not a problem).

I feel compelled to note, in light of your comments on the attitudinal system not being mapped to gismu, that we intentionally DID use scales and oppositional mapping for the attitudinals, knowing that what we were doing was not especially "neutral", and that the gismu were NOT necessarily scalar in the same way. But it wasn't really a question of "cultural neutrality" per se, since so far as I know, no other language/culture attempts to map attitudes in any way like what we did in Lojban.

But in as much as some emotions require nai in order to be expressed and others do not (We didn't have the wordspace to *not* make use of opposition scales), it is arguable that Zipfean factors might cause bias towards the shorter words (whether Zipf's law might work to this effect is of course entirely hypothetical), and I chose the shorter ones to therefore be emotions that I thought were the more basic, or possibly the more positive/beneficial of the pairings in question. If there has to be a bias, it might as well be a positive one.

But who am I to dictate what emotions are "positive"? Just the guy who concocted the system. I make no apologies %^)

--
Bob LeChevalier    lojbab@lojban.org    www.lojban.org
President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.