[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:55:11 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bphTSxN7WVUZjJ6j8D2n9MipaklwVWWCtIjLSYngZU=; b=Tz+qULszQV5h0wNhGNjWOjXxLCvdy4EQ5xrFg/iZ/AygKDzG7qtXOO35yZNDbMI7Wg 6kGdqwzOIBEo+yNnJKC6O++5DFgMYU68Tx6Y2dmW4zDPqEkcJ9SG+XbMQgzbZxdJLiSz j5Ht8RW9hXuBgLjvQlBM9KByk0hZfutFss814=
In-reply-to: <CAO7tK2cxtsQ40t21Jujko_5h1E6BT58nz6wki7E40wvz-fLs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAGO2uOPcMjNogyRO8Wi-v+swm60xLR8X21=aykzmcMOh51e0-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGO2uOM=s_W32Np-NYW7WSGawR96K5JXVCqgeK5hbu2QNzB9Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj1=42g+ubU+DBsqz3cKc+OZLHhG7nfmX9o1dCYqt+VTKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGO2uOPhxRB3ULO-FR7ZjgotoiWs5qGViGML_CYr7mUdrcE2Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj3aKi-i1ctjZ1ds1tinSFgzLxCzobxAyiRzrjOqBmpowg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGO2uOOGsUZvsNF5od4cfxeo8FX2-4ELApaSCFkUKt4uNY_Lfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj2yw0qDh8gJD3g6WNfp+sNtbp4AKEmqO+bTqw3=57rSAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGO2uOPbEP=xHEbiVqKtV=MtFipdeTuYeChJyaFOeCk8Nzcv7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj3ccePRbn4o6AAg6kUBq9L81wiP3uvujvdTf2uiLXS7LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj1FHdRsT1_fxeF+HoE6_9wGA-0DR2PGSbzA6SmiLLwdTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGO2uOMmQC5Gukr59RpQiGXc1x5UoX3mP1dbrrxNkAyr7TckVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALm==BXREvbHdGWT-QwCMG=qBz9=vRW=2mGHU=9nke33B+zceQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOEKkSHpeKOqLAsw5OU82nPUJwyDqWnHSkP_FPtQQjg58m+iQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7tK2cxtsQ40t21Jujko_5h1E6BT58nz6wki7E40wvz-fLs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20

Jorge Llambías, On 11/08/2012 01:36:

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com>  wrote:


Now, as to Escape's contention that such kind of phonemic ambiguity in words
of potentially disastrous confusion (i.e., opposite words in the same scale)
doesn't exist in natural languages, I WILL challenge that assertion.
<facetiousness>  Really?  Have you studied all the scales in all of the
world's many thousands of languages?  You impress me!</facetiousness>  I
haven't found any yet, but I can't dismiss the possibility it exists in a
natlang...


How about "can" vs "can't" in English? The difference between them can
be rather minimal.


Sorry to xorxes; as I wade through vast email backlog I find xorxes had already made this observation before me.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

References:
- [lojban] Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] {.au}/{djica}={.ai}/{?}. No gismu for intention
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread