From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro}
Am 15.08.2012 16:05, schrieb tijlan:
> That wouldn't work consistently with {du'u}. According to that
> interpretation, one would have
>
> do djuno lo du'u mi citka ma kau
> You know that I eat anything.
>
> do djuno lo du'u mi djica lo nu klama ma kau
> You know that I want to go wherever
Yes, the first example I gave isn't good. The point of this ma kau is that it appears outside of an abstraction, but of course what you show is still a problem. The usage of that ma kau would be limited to outside of abstractions.
Am 15.08.2012 16:26, schrieb John E Clifford:
> Well, {ma kau} marks an indirect question and in this usage there seems to be nothing either indirect or a question.
Well, I'm not sure that's true. Many natlangs use a Wh-question word for this construction. French has n'importe ou/quoi/qui etc, English has
whatever/wherever, German has wo auch immer, wer auch immer, sonstwo... So maybe there really is a hint of a question there, if just in that the speaker indirectly talks about the possible answer without saying what it is.
For the other meanings of any, su'o/ro/no is still the way to go, but I don't think anybody argues with that anyway.
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
-- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to
lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.