[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [lojban] Re: Zombie



On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
On , ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not all uses of "zombie" (in English) involve a controller; e.g. Left 4 Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Shawn of the Dead, etc.

Yes, I've seen all those "BRAAAAIIINS" and green skin around but I would favour the original Voodoo myth :)


> Also, I'd just like to note that I have difficulty pronouncing the terminal {ii} to be distinct from {i}.

We have a similar problem in Italian with "principii" (principles) and "principi" (princes). With some exercise they come out very distinct.

It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii} is a diphthong pronounced "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced "EE".

What would be your take on fu'ivla containing {dii}?

The same as my take on all fu'ivla: I don't like it.

You'll have to be more specific if you want a better answer.

Do you notice any difficulties with {dii}?

No. Should I?

Allowing {ii} after coronal sounds like {d} causes many fine minimal contrasts - {di dzi dji zi ji} seems plenty; those with {dii dzii djii zii jii} seems excessive. 

For some people, plain semivowel {i} will be mixed up with some sort of fricative or affricate even before OPEN vowels.   When you place it near {i}, you are almost insisting that they (af)fricatize it.

I have no idea what you just said.

What I am trying to say is that, if all those combinations become common, people from around the world are going to mispronounce them and confuse them with one another.  I am implying that disallowing {ii} helps Lojban reach its goal that the sounds and the letters correspond with each other "one-to-one".

I'm not talking about what should and should not be allowed. All I'm saying is that in Lojban, {ii}, is pronounced "yee", and {i} is pronounced "ee".

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.