Re: [lojban] Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

We are probably screwing some things up, but this is not obviously one of them.  I need to go to the store if the store is the relevant place to get what I need.  I am mnot necessarily obliged to go to the store, even if it has what I need for some project, unless I am obliged to finish the project -- or unless you take "obliged" in a practical sense.  {bliga} has similar problems, aside from the issue of to whom you are obliged and by what fiat.

---

From: la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising

While we're putting this to the record, I would like to point out to all of you Anglophones that it seems very much like you're misusing {nitcu} where {bilga} would be far more appropriate, i.e. "I need to go to the store.". --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/0xu-WIgocAYJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.