On 30 September 2012 00:56, la gleki
<gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://dag.github.com/cll/7/11/
11.1) le ka ce'u gleki
the property-of (X being-happy)
the property of being happy
happiness
and11.2) le ka gleki ce'u
the property-of (being-happy about-X)
the property of being that which someone is happy about
These examples are pretty clear. No ambiguity. Now let's open Chapter 11.4
4.9) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka mi prami ce'u
John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X).
This is something very strange.
Let's imagine that I'm a boy and I meet a girl. I tell her
{do melbi mi lo ka ce'u clani}
Does {ce'u} refer to {do} or {mi}?
It definitely refers to melbi1. If x3 is the aspect in which x1 is beautiful, it's pretty clear that it's the x1 that is referred to by the argument place in clani.