On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Jacob Errington
<nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
Although I don't fully follow what it is you're trying to get at here, it's generally agreed upon that using ka that way is no good. In general use, ka is used only for "pure functions" -- properties and not qualitites, which is how the CLL describes ka.
Okay.
That being said, I'd just use {nu}, which I believe represents an particular instance of a predication, which is just a property with the ce'u-places filled in:
{lo nu lo fagri cu glare cu pluka mi}
or perhaps,
{lo nu seli'i lo fagri cu glare cu pluka mi}
The second one is interesting. Instead of "nu seli'i", why not just "li'i"? Is "nu" rquired by pluka?