Re: [lojban] experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity

[Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>]

I created LAhE, and to be perfectly honest, I am discontent with the actual choice of word for it. It should have been something like ko'oi or ko'ei. I also agree that its status as a LAhE is quite silly. Rather than recycle a word that was poorly chosen to begin with, let's use something that will actually look like an attitudinal. How about {.e'ei} ? It looks like {.ei} for "obligation" but it will mean "command". Seeing as usage of xa'e is very limited, I simply propose that we remove it entirely. LAhE-based imperatives is silly.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 16 November 2012 12:33, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

Am 16.11.2012 18:39, schrieb guskant:

How do you think about {ko'oi}? Any comments will be appreciated.

Since xa'e as LAhE is quite awkward, I have proposed to move it to UI. UI are easier to handle and more flexible. I added an alternate definition for xa'e on jbovlaste which only needs more votes to become the preferred one. I'm not sure we need two different cmavo.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
--
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

doị mèlbi mlenì'u
   .i do càtlu ki'u
ma fe la xàmpre ŭu
   .i do tìnsa càrmi
gi'e sìrji se tàrmi
   .i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku


.

.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.