[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity
Am 16.11.2012 23:32, schrieb Jacob Errington:
I created LAhE, and to be perfectly honest, I am discontent with the
actual choice of word for it. It should have been something like ko'oi
or ko'ei. I also agree that its status as a LAhE is quite silly. Rather
than recycle a word that was poorly chosen to begin with,
Yeah I agree. xa'e might not be the best choice.
let's use
something that will actually look like an attitudinal. How about {.e'ei}
? It looks like {.ei} for "obligation" but it will mean "command".
Seeing as usage of xa'e is very limited, I simply propose that we remove
it entirely. LAhE-based imperatives is silly.
Or ko'oi. At least it resembles ko. I'd say we shouldn't use up .V'VV
cmavo yet. I think the current wave of new cmavo should use only CV'VV
and CVV'V. This will make it easier in the future to see during which
era of Lojban history a cmavo was created.
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
--
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo
doị mèlbi mlenì'u
.i do càtlu ki'u
ma fe la xàmpre ŭu
.i do tìnsa càrmi
gi'e sìrji se tàrmi
.i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku
.
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.