[lojban] Vote for {xa'e} as UI6 (pu "experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity")

[guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:33 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 16.11.2012 18:39, schrieb guskant:
>
>> How do you think about {ko'oi}? Any comments will be appreciated.
>
>
> Since xa'e as LAhE is quite awkward, I have proposed to move it to UI. UI
> are easier to handle and more flexible. I added an alternate definition for
> xa'e on jbovlaste which only needs more votes to become the preferred one.
> I'm not sure we need two different cmavo.
>

OK, I voted for {xa'e} as UI6.
http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/xa'e

However, as I mentioned in the first message of this thread, it can
qualify not only a smuti but also two sentences connected with ijek:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:39 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3) do .onai ko'oi lo mi speni co'a morsi
> 3-1) do co'a morsi .ijonai ko'oi lo mi speni co'a morsi
but your definition of {xa'e} mentions only a sumti. The definition
may need to be improved.

How would be a Lojbanic definition of {xa'e} as UI6? Do you accept the
following selsku that I added to jbovlaste?

tcita lo se cusku le du'u la'e vo'e te minde ja se cpedu ja se curmi
ja se pacna ja se stidi ja se djica ja se bilga

I will improve it if necessary.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.