Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:58:31PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>    [snip] which is why
>    CLL1.1 is being encoded in LaTeX and hosted in a git repository: being in
>    LaTeX makes it easy to print the same material in a large variety of
>    formats, including but not limited to the ones I've mentioned, and being
>    in a git repo makes it very easy to submit changes to the CLL on an as
>    needed basis.

A minor technical point, not detracting from your main point:

CLL1.1 is written in docbook.  The print version of CLL1.1 converts
the logical docbook format into LaTeX typesetting commands.  One
unresolved issue for CLL1.1 is that this conversion does not
produce an acceptable result and needs to be tweaked and fixed.

My impression is that this is the #1 item on the todo list, but
in that I could be mistaken.

mi'e .alyn.
-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.