[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?



Jonathan Jones wrote:
Those are all good questions, and my answers are, in order: I don't even
know if we're bothering with the voting part or just implicitly
accepting them as voted approved when they're made blue; yes, it's part
of the wiki, you just have to add the poll to a page if you want voting
on something in it; I don't know if there is a such thing as "official
leave", but I'm pretty sure voting is a simple majority and we don't all
have to vote at the same time, just whenever we get around to going to
the poll and choosing our response, so it could take as much as a month
to get all the votes depending on personal time constraints; not at all, no.

Actually, such votes are by consensus - we made it consensus minus 1 to allow for bypassing a lone holdout. But a "no" vote requires an explanation.

From the obsolete procedures page.
Votes on non-administrative issues are consensus minus 1.
Votes on administrative issues are 2/3 majority. A vote on an
administrative issue may be called at any time by any member, and
everyone, including the jatna, is bound by them. The jatna strongly
prefers that you take any problems up with him first, however.

lojbab
--
Bob LeChevalier    lojbab@lojban.org    www.lojban.org
President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.