On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:31:21AM -0800, John E Clifford wrote:
> Always could; existence is a predicate, being there is the UD.
> So, {lo pavyseljirna cu broda} always implies {da pavyseljirna}
> but never (directly) {da poi pavyseljirna cu zasti}.
Could you please elaborate on that a bit?
Neither do I agree that existence is a predicate(not on the level
of semantical analysis), nor do I agree with the implications
you derive from {lo brode cu broda}.
But maybe I just didn't get you...
v4hn
Attachment:
pgpyjzOcLYniL.pgp
Description: PGP signature