On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:56:09PM -0500, Ian Johnson wrote:
> It's not that it doesn't, only that it needn't. Specifying explicitly that
> it doesn't isn't possible. va'i xorlo doesn't really "fix" this per se, in
> that under the modified "x1 looks for x2 at x3" definition, you can't
> explicitly say "I'm looking for a green thing, I don't care which one", at
> least not without introducing another bridi.
... And we are back to the "any" discussion.
This, however, has not really anything to do with {sisku} /per se/.
I agree with selpa'i in that it should work out quite well to use lo(also le
for e.g. "my keys") here (using the modified definition) and that this change
makes a lot of sense due to xorlo.
v4hn
Attachment:
pgp99YYukoaLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature