On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:03:21PM +0100, Sebastian Fröjd wrote: > 2013/1/14 la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> > > .ie CLL 2.0 must have guidelines of lojbanising Latin names. An algorithm > > (like the one we have for gismu) would be an ideal solution. That "must" is surely your opinion. Also CLL 2.0 seems to be your favorite keyword for every change _you_ would ever like to see happen. Over the last year you more or less proposed a complete rewrite. > .iesai Doesn't sound so difficult really. Why not having an algorithm > translating IPA to lojban for all languages, so for every phone (phonetics) > you translate it into the most lojbanic phonematic counterpart? It's probably not as simple as this, because not every sequence of letters is allowed in lojban. No idea if this is a problem with latin, but then, why would you want to restrict something like that to latin? v4hn
Attachment:
pgpM9RuZwTZe9.pgp
Description: PGP signature