[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] criteria for the dictionary



On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Sebastian Fröjd wrote:
> It would also be a shorter way to start contributing (well you can
> contribute anyway ofcourse, but I think you do a better work when you're
> familiar with the discussions).

I agree, the way in which information is presented in the community
isn't really compatible with newcomers contributing.
However, I'm quite sure you wouldn't be the first one trying to implement
a "working" platform that would quickly become as "useless", in this regards,
as the rest.

> But still, if no one read "mail that long"
> does that mean all proposals must be short? Or is it even possible for
> someone non-BPFK to come with proposals?

What do you mean by "proposals"?

One of the last discussions recently made clear, that _there should not
be any proposals_ at the moment. None will be accepted or rejected officially.
They will, however, be ignored by most(if not all) of the people in the bpfk.
Take a look at glekis many tries to convince yourself.

If you really want to contribute to the language, either help fixing the CLL
or write (formally very strict) proposals for cmavo definitions for the byfy.
Before that part is done, you wouldn't even know, what exactly you
would like to change, because there is no reference stating what is the case
right now!


v4hn

Attachment: pgpAHVkoNCsbJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature