[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: criteria for the dictionary
la gleki wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:55:12 PM UTC+4, jongausib wrote:
I know two guys who are against anything that is non-jvajvo.
Whoopie for them. .ionai
I can probably find two guys who are against any particular proposal
that is made, without a lot of difficulty.
.ie CLL 2.0 must have guidelines of lojbanising Latin names.
Not likely to happen, since word-making rules aren't likely to be enough
of a priority to even be considered until AFTER 2.0 is done.
An algorithm (like the one we have for gismu) would be an ideal solution.
Anyone can make an algorithm if they want. There will be no official
consideration of such algorithms anytime soon. Document them in the
wiki or somewhere that people interested can find them. (Metatopics in
the wiki pointing to a lot of such things would probably be useful, if
they don't already exist.)
lojbab
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.