On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:13:21PM -0500, Michael Turniansky wrote: > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:35 AM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote: > > Language has to provide means for people to _express_ what things _might_ > > be > > and therefore provide a basis for people to express what _they think_ > > things are. > > > > It's not, and nobody said it is, dependent on the language > > whether the Goa'uld are gods or not! It depends on the perspective! > > If you listen to the Goa'uld servants speaking english, they might still > > utter "The Goa'uld are gods". If you listen to a member of SG-1, they > > might utter "The Goa'uld are no gods". Neither one is said to be wrong > > from a pure 'language perspective'. > > > tu'e paunai xu la'i go,auld la'a na fatci cevni mi na'e kucli mu'i lodu'u do na ka'e satci skicu lodu'u lo cevni ku mokau > . iku'i gy te krici lo nu cevni ku lo selfu tu'u iseni'ibo ri pilno > lu lo cevni li'u .ije lo drata pilno ba'e lu le cevni li'u to'i pu ju'o la xorlos toi v4hn
Attachment:
pgp9DCJs13Hel.pgp
Description: PGP signature