Re: [lojban] da and existence

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

No, I don't think so.  At least not necessarily.  The UD can be fairly small  (and how can large in comparison with infinity be exaggeration neutral?)  And certainly, not everything exists.  Unicorns don't for this discourse at least.  And neither does Sherlocke Holmes (any of him). 

---

From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] da and existence

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

In another thread there were comments that led me to believe that {da} must refer to a thing that actually exists. 

.i sampu .i .ia cai zo'o nai ro da zasti .i lo munje cu barda fi lo cimni ba'u cu'i 

mi'e la stela selckiku 

mu'o 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.