Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla

[la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:29:42 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I understand the history of the question. I m just wondering about technical
> > issues and the *current* policy.
> > When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and camxes
> > every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps?
>
> Ideally, people who coin fu'ivla should already be familiar with the
> morphology rules, so they wouldn't need to consult. In practice, yes,
> until all morphology issues have been settled and the jbovlaste's
> algorithm has been updated.
>
> I don't think you will find any discrepancies when it comes to lujvo,
> which is what most of jbovlaste consists of.
>
> > Otherwise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes?
>
> A few of the words already there are not compatible with camxes.

Then they are to be removed form jvs in future, right?

 

> mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.