la .guskant. cu cusku di'e
{na} is a selbri tag in all those, but it, as well as {bau} and {fi'o ve
tavla}, is a bridi operator.
Traditionally, the selbri tag {na} is equivalent to {naku} at the
beginning of the sentence, then {na} scopes over the whole bridi in
every case.
However, because of the problem shown in
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na , {na} is treated in the same way
as the other bridi operators: the earlier has wider scope. Then the four
bridi are equivalent to the following bridi:
(6a') bau lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
(6b') fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
(6c') naku zo'u fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e tavla
(6d') naku zo'u mi do zo'e lo jbobau tavla
Yes.
The scope of {na} seems different between ((6a'),(6b')) and ((6c'),(6d')).
How exactly is it different? You mean because the language-tags in (6a') and (6b') have scope over {na}, but not in (6c') and (6d')? Yes, that's true, but that's because the former two use tags, and the latter two don't. The tags are the diffence, not {na} itself. {na} is under the scope of another operator in the first two. Or am I misunderstanding you?
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.