[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:44:07 -0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=5fcB79J7pAhGx3lST3ESaVaejIpeHOoxxiW/pWJCkew=; b=UIzzY6cCtjIVNRUxxbped7QjAllb6i7O5cIe8PFvEjYbWAKyvN2H/VZ7KCqc3VR7qh +rU5Si2tON8FF7XXERuCPhRnZN9UUorhPnXBR/NzRstyGs12ajLov8U0CA+ajqjz75FO DI7YjF701Ms+UVvkep1vSCjtPVEJvVUkbKVHL7rFPWWPIe5klx+D7HEv90cZ+inXu4Kd LbvYt8Au2wATepTSHXhzRzk7B859B/w09QMlycooPze1UfcJxiVUtAqpnrUazVehlSl5 7NVF/stoPt7JmvicjwX9rcfRTG3ER/KJ79WaYylE78MF3K73gV/e19Q2dOIT33kbNi1A /MHA==
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=5fcB79J7pAhGx3lST3ESaVaejIpeHOoxxiW/pWJCkew=; b=bpkV6qbWJ04lyXlY7ZuImVGz9561AfvLwmigMleE4HXiRt11ZVqwOwVr5S/SJUE1Pc w7QWuwuzUz7NU0vJk4xXqLY0gK4Yse0u9Wpp9y59/junhkqXR6r/DTWO3z2hP9WeBHBI oao/wKfaBFjdjEkypnNd5ak4lfzK2tjU5jbtcuCa3pqS4brlzOsiIUVB3kW9b0+k2sm0 ggWd98nQkCdrUHyWIwuqVG+tigwADqYw0neUSLgBG/G7CyxNdFrLTZt/F0BUyu3Okmjn UUZn++rvNF8YyVSnSv9Sq5t1PfhVWGZqDi4JXIfIz4AktzgVng4L3J17n/Bd3ymjyd10 1xIA==
In-reply-to: <CA+gZtgJOV_u8fWOryhuqu_r+PpoCuKYUxg+=YG0-H2oEMr2fVw@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAOQ8VDV21KdHLncsr2yhqnneNpE-rbV8gcjdkXhjnPJyFrJP6A@mail.gmail.com> <518FC9B5.1090805@lojban.org> <CAOQ8VDX+4HDxrkUCF+YzBVeviExzeZFGvTODJwcc0ssCpU1+fg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+gZtgJOV_u8fWOryhuqu_r+PpoCuKYUxg+=YG0-H2oEMr2fVw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:

Incidentally, why is it that the PEG can't make {.i fi'o broda bo mi brode} parse correctly, whereas it can fix things like JOI connecting LE-sumti without {ku}?

I don't think PEG has a problem with it.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
  - From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
  - From: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
  - From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
  - From: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
  - From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Now, take any thing by any language clear as 100%, from my thought...
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread