[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] questions about lojban



But xorlo is the only *official* difference (whatever that is worth, obviously).  Your final comments raise the issue of what your xorlo is like -- clearly different from mine ("salient node ...") and apparently making {lo broda} applicable to things totally unlike brodas (which might, I suppose, be particularly bad cases of {le broda}).  To be sure, many cases of {lo broda} are anaphoric in the sense that they renew an earlier reference to brodas, but that is just what nouns repeated most often do.  As to whether numbers apply to lo broda, that depends upon what brodas are, I suppose, but pretty generally, given Lojban's implicit ontology, they are enumeratable, 



From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] questions about lojban

la .pycyn. cu cusku di'e
> Herein is the crux.  What is Lojban?  It is surely not the language off
> CLL or much like it;

Surely not.

> it is not that modified by xorlo (any of the dozen
> or so xorlos, not counting those by xorxes himself).

xorlo is but a tiny fraction of what sets apart CLL-Lojban from Now-Lojban.

> Honesty would have
> it extracted from all the text around, assuming that could be collected,
> but that is probably not a consistent corpus and certainly would not
> meet the requirements of being a loglang.  Even the corpus of one
> Lojbanist is somewhat iffy.  You have two choices: a new
> presecriptivism, which decides all issues and lays down the law in a
> tight program, (OK, three -- we could go back to CLL) or a free-for-all
> building to a new consensus and eventual formalization.

In case of choice number 1, who would decide all the issues and lay down the law?

> (In either case, {PA lo broda} is not the same as {PA broda}.)

Right. I wouldn't call them equivalent, since obviously {PA lo broda} is quantification over the referent(s) of {lo broda}, while {PA broda} never goes through that step. It just happens that there are cases where it makes no difference which one you use. When it does make a difference, it is often an "anaphoric" use of {lo broda}, sometimes in a malgli way (when the speaker unconsciously wants to do what {le} actually does). The difference between the two expressions (or the lack thereof) hinges to some degree at least on how {lo broda} is conceptualized; is it a group of indeterminate number or is it {lo xo na'i broda} (that is, the concept of number just doesn't apply to it until you explicitly specify number using an inner quantifier) ?.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.