Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

And,of course, others of us think that what needs discussing is grammar, to get it right.  Vocabulary arises as it is needed but we are way ahead of any uses in that area.  How we put that stuff together, however, is what makes for a logical language, and there there are apparent gaps and inconsistencies.

---

From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla

On Monday, June 10, 2013 12:30:37 selpa'i wrote:
> la .pier. cu cusku di'e
>
> > I oppose this merge both before and after the baseline.
>
> Please explain your reasons so that they can be considered and/or addressed.

I did already. There is no reason to even think of such a radical change. What
we need to discuss is vocabulary, to make more of it.

Pierre
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.