Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo}

[selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>]

la .pycyn. cu cusku di'e
> Still uncomfortable about the construction, adding a place but not
> filling it

But it's entirely normal to do that! I don't know why you distinguish
between tenses and BAI here. Both are tags, so both can either tag
something explicitly or not. Here is a natural example using a BAI as
selbri tag:

	mi xagji .i mi mu'i jukpa lo sanmi
	"I'm hungry. I, motivated by it/that, cook a meal."

{mu'i} implicitly tags {zo'e}, which in this context obviously refers to
my state of hunger. There is nothing weird about that.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.