Re: [lojban] mivzdacti

[Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>]

To be honest, I was mostly joking about the fairy tale reference. We can restrict the lujvo meaning as much as we like, so long as the Lojban definition is good.

As for Gleki's remark, in order for an organism to be parasitic, must it necessarily *eat* its host? If we consider a tapeworm to be a parasite, then the answer is "no", because the tapeworm eats the host's food rather than the host proper. However, I have no suggestions as to how to reflect this in the lujvo. 

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 17 July 2013 12:07, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

It just occured to me that I prefer {mivzdacti} over the other options. Apart from tsani's argument, I somehow overlooked that  {mivzdacti} doesn't need a -sel- to begin with, so my previous post becomes more or less void.

mivzdacti = x1 citka x2 noi jmive gi'e zdani vo'a

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.