Well, actually it is spang on. Lojban is as useless (and uglier) than Descript for getting toilet paper at a drugstore. It all depends on purpose and aesthetic. The writing system is a metaphor for the conlang game.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 16, 2013, at 19:34, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:09:03PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> Why should it be? Ithkuil is a perfectly legitimate conlang despite the
>>> fact that it's impossible to speak in real time.
>>
>> I was speaking personally, and about writing systems, not languages. I
>> don't see the point of using a writing system that, well, isn't usable.
>
> Ever tried to ba'e write Ithkuil? Not much better.
>
>> Why would I use a writing system that takes minutes to write one word when
>> I can use one that takes deciseconds?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligraphy
> Writing is just as much an art as it is a tool.
> ta'o I don't understand why cursive should not be usable.
> In the worst case you can always learn "standard" forms of many words
> instead of trying to read each word letter by letter.
>
> This, however, still has nothing to do with lojban.
>
>
> v4hn
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/FyCsPLJ_elo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.