Using "pare" as the argument to "ju'u" is asking for trouble, since interpreting its meaning depends upon the base you are in! Every numbering system thinks it's in base "10". That's why gai is a safer choice.--gejyspaOn Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, <pyra...@princeton.edu> wrote:
Back on topic: I think the essential idea would be best represented by {li pano ju'u pare}, {li panono ju'u pare}, {li panono ju'u pare}.
On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:08:22 PM UTC-4, aionys wrote:On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Pierre Abbat <ph...@bezitopo.org> wrote:
<snip>On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 17:19:21 Jonathan Jones wrote:That would be an egg chicken. I'd just say "sovda", as long as it's clear from
> I could be wrong and it's {sovjipci}, not {jipcyso'a}, but I don't think so.
the context that they are chicken eggs and that they are not laid by roosters.
Or are you asking which came first?No, sometimes I get which part goes first in a lujvo backwards. In this case, I was pretty sure that a "chicken egg" is {jipcyso'a}, but just in case....
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out .