Re: [lojban] [oz] {dizlo tonga}

[Pierre Abbat <phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org>]

On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 22:25:15 selpa'i wrote:
> la .pier. cu cusku di'e
> 
> > We say "snosli tonga".
> 
> (Who is this "we"?)

I forget who else, but I've seen "mlisnosli" and "tcesnosli" for "tenor" and 
"bass".

> Back on topic, while the idea is good, I'd say the lujvo should be
> {slisno}, not {snosli}. Then again, the place structure of {slilu},
> specifically its x2, makes it a bit meaningless to use {masno} on it.
> There doesn't seem to be a difference between "oscillating quickly at
> 1Hz" and "oscillating slowly at 1Hz"; neither is faster or slower than
> the other. Because of that x2, I think the better lujvo would be
> {cmasli} (and {brasli}).

I think "cmasli" better fits an oscillation with a small amplitude.

Pierre
-- 
loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.