Re: [lojban] Monospaced font for Lojban

[Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>]

I wouldn't say that monospace is conventional. The very first documents where in monospace font because they were produced in the very early times of computers.

More recent translation all use non monospace font (like Times New Roman)

The topic of Lojban typography is very interesting but I think that too little thought has been put into it.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, <bas@underware.nl> wrote:

What are the conventions for typesetting Lojban? 

Is it true that using a monospaced font is the most conventional approach?

And what would be the logic of (dogmatically) sticking to a monospace font?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.