You proposed:
> cmavo(etc. etc. etc.)
> x1 is a structure word of grammatical class x2 (la'e zo), with
> meaning/function x3 in usage (language) x4.
Okay, I have some small questions (about clarification) regarding the
proposal.
In your proposal, which words are allowed to fill x2?
Take the selma'o “A” for example: This selma'o has the words “.a”,
“.e”, “.o”, “.u” and “je”. Which word is allowed to fill x2? Just
“a” (“A” simply lower-cased) or any word of the selma'o A? So that for
example “zo .a cmavo la'e zo .e” would be valid.
Would your proposal /only/ permit the usage of the “zo .a cmavo la'e zo
.a” form? Would the form “zo .a cmavo lo cmavrxavo” be still permitted
or is that out-ruled? Which other forms would be permitted (if any)?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.