[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Who needs the LLG?



Good morning everyone,

last night I visited the #balningau channel
and quickly got into an argument with ldlework.

Basically, his position is the following:

- The LLG (which no one in this ninjbo movement ever attended as far as I know)
  is obsolete and lojban doesn't need it anymore
- Annual meetings make no sense because issues in lojban
  arise more dynamically and should be resolved, also by
  changing the language officially, by a dynamic group
  of people instead of a committee - for the final act of making
  the change official one person is enough (see next item)
- It's much better to use the "benevolent dictator" principle
  on all levels (this includes decisions of the LLG)

This is a rather more radical perspective than the latest
"leadership" debate, so I thought someone might wants to
comment on this.


v4hn

Attachment: pgprT_GfZDqoZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature